Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavours to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen?—On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependence on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty. Repeal that law, and you will soon see a change in their manners. St. Monday, and St. Tuesday, will cease to be holidays. SIX days shalt thou labour, though one of the old commandments long treated as out of date, will again be looked upon as a respectable precept; industry will increase, and with it plenty among the lower people; their circumstances will mend, and more will be done for their happiness by inuring them to provide for themselves, than could be done by dividing all your estates among them.”
(Benjamin Franklin, "On
the Price of Corn and the Management of the Poor" (1766), Writings
(New York: Library of America, 1987), 587-88).
This line stuck out to me: "that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer.". Thanks for your blog!!
ReplyDeleteWe should have listened to him!
ReplyDeleteExcellent! The Founders were geniuses. Politicians who insist on entitlements for the poor (which they do for votes) are on the opposite end of the intelligence spectrum.
ReplyDelete